Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 778 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unit 51000046 location update #3124
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Done! Thank you

    in reply to: Monitor your uradmonitor! #3122
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    If that doesn’t help, I should be able to send you a custom firmware, to pinpoint the problem as the device sees it.

    in reply to: Monitor your uradmonitor! #3120
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Hello Ken,

    By any chance, is it possible to connect the unit to a different router and/or a different ISP?

    in reply to: 110000CB – Permanently Installed #3118
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Wow, Jayson, thanks for documenting this, really awesome photos!

    in reply to: Introduce Yourself! #3117
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Hi Abraham, and welcome!

    Indeed your readings are higher. We’ll need to expand the network in your area and have some redundancy on the measurements.

    in reply to: Coordinate adjustment for 5100005D #3115
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Coordinates for your unit, 5100005D, changed as per your request. Congrats on running the first unit in Mexico!!
    https://www.uradmonitor.com/?open=5100005D

    I’m surprised to see the higher readings there. I wonder what is the cause for that

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by uRADMonitor.
    in reply to: coordinate change for unit 5100004D #3114
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Coordinates changed!

    in reply to: Basel, Switzerland #3087
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    I saw it as well. Will try to get more data on it.

    in reply to: Request: fully open-source online firmware ASAP #3085
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    As soon as the security is implemented to something similar to what you have suggested (the key, etc). Currently all efforts go towards finalising the model D hardware.

    in reply to: KIT1 problems, also I suck… #3084
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    The 2.2K couldn’t have harmed the circuit in any way.

    in reply to: KIT1 problems, also I suck… #3080
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Hi Hashy!

    Don’t be too harsh on yourself.

    If I got it right, what happened is that you pressed the tube against the middle clip and that punctured the tube?

    The middle connector is there for those that want to use the shorter SI3BG tube, very insensitive, but better to offer it as an alternative.

    The SBM20 which is supplied with the KIT, only needs the to far-end clips for support.

    Now, if the tube is broken, it lost its internal gases and special pressure parameters, making it impossible to register any counts, exactly like you described. If touching the contacts results in counts, this shows your soldering skills are OK, and replacing the tube will get it working.

    Sorry for this, I’ll make sure to add the SI3BG details to the next manual revision. Also, make sure the seller sends you a tested/working SBM20 tube, and not anything else (like STS-5, etc, some sellers are not serious about what they are doing).

    And please post some pics, might be useful for others reading this. At least as a warning.

    in reply to: KIT1 Feedback #3079
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    Amazing work ecloud! Also thanks for the great feedback.

    LE: also published on the project’s FB page: https://www.facebook.com/uRADMonitor/

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 10 months ago by uRADMonitor.
    in reply to: KIT1 v102 resistors #3067
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    That looks good. Sorry for the confusion with the resistors, I’ll make sure to correct it in the next version of the PCB. As said, it was to preserve backwards compatibility for using the LM317 instead of the better LM1117 . And backwards compatibility is a pain, nearly every time.

    Radu

    in reply to: Add more user informations #3064
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    That is personal information that can’t be made public by default.

    in reply to: KIT1 Feedback #3061
    uRADMonitor
    Keymaster

    That’s an excellent solution, Robert; the tube connectors should have been one size bigger. Will keep this in mind for the next batch, I used the correct size for my prototypes, but the factory which helped me with production, mixed up the sizes (those are 5mm fuse holders, should have been 6mm).

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 778 total)