Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
uRADMonitor
KeymasterWorks fine for me. But let us know if you continue to experience slow performance.
February 8, 2016 at 10:17 pm in reply to: Unit 11000016 in Norway showing slow but steady increase #2790uRADMonitor
KeymasterHi Lars,
Is the current location ok? https://www.uradmonitor.com/?open=11000016
uRADMonitor
KeymasterHi Mitch,
IMO the additional enclosures are not needed, but they surely bring additional protection to the unit. To answer the questions:
– The model A units were effectively tested in the -20 .. +65 Celsius interval with no impact on their functionality. That is -4 .. +149 F .
– No. Thin plastic enclosures are transparent to Gamma radiation.
– No, but care should be taken, as increasing the temperature over +65 might degrade the magnetic properties of the ferrite core, resulting in the high voltage inverter being unable to supply the required voltage to the Geiger tube. If you compare existing charts, you’ll see the direct link between temperature and the inverter’s duty cycle parameter – quite interesting.
– Free air no, but outdoors yes, as that is where a possible contamination can come from.
– Interesting question. In case of a nuclear incident, fallout covering the ground will be registered by the detector. Intensity varies with the square distance to the source. So the height requirement is in place to ensure consistent response all across the network, but if such an event occurs, this is the last thing to worry about. Snow can be disregarded, even if it affects the height, it is temporary.uRADMonitor
KeymasterHi Mitch, indeed, this could prove useful! Will see for the next firmware upgrade.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThat’s a good approach, however I’m not sure on how often the monitoring site calls the API.
If too often, it might trigger the DoS protection and get ignored (interpreted as a sigh of deliberate server resources consumption).EDIT: Indeed if there is no recent data, the JSOn answer will show an empty array (no matches).
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by
uRADMonitor.
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by
uRADMonitor.
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by
uRADMonitor.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterWith the increasing number of sensors, on the map you’ll be able to select the parameter of interest.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThere are only a few changes between the two. I wouldn’t regret it.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThanks for the idea. Do you have some samples on such data? How complex is it?
uRADMonitor
KeymasterFor fixed units, the data is stored with the unit.
Looking back is possible, using the timestamp.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThe forum is implemented with bbPress . While fixing this issue locally would be a quick solution, I think it might be better to signal it to the project owner:
https://bbpress.org/forums/Can you post it there as well?
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThank you, I will investigate this and report back.
uRADMonitor
Keymaster1. Instantly
2. No (but will be soon. Server holds 10 min interval data, with only the last measurement being recorded, while the devices send data every 1 min. Instead of holding only the 10th measurement, an average will be implemented for all 10 values).
3. YesI suspect this is related to the other issue you’ve observed. I’ll need to investigate it further and report back.
Thanks!
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThat makes it even better!
uRADMonitor
KeymasterThanks David. As soon as you get the latest firmware running, let me know how it goes in regards to the issue.
uRADMonitor
KeymasterYes, sorry for that. Just changed the coordinates and city name!
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by
-
AuthorPosts