- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 10 months ago by .
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Hi,
I made a kit1 but i have NaN on the map.
I think because i set the si8b tube with 0xC id (code attach).
My station id 13000208
Thanks
OrtoSystem
Yes, i see the web page.
If i download the data from dashboard the value are correct.
OrtoSystem
Hi guys,
Indeed the new tube needs to be defined on the server side too, I am perfectly ok to allocating 0xC for this excellent pancake tube.
I do have one and can run the tests to determine the approximative conversion from CPM to eq dose rate, but only in a few weeks from now.
So instead, we might put some approximative values in place, if @ortoSystem can help me with that. I would need background radiation readings on two units, one with the standard SBM20 tube and next to it the unit with SI8B.
Radu
Hi Radhoo,
I did these two tests:
All cpm are a mean on an hour.
I run 1 hour of measurements with the SI8B and SBM20 and I found a conversion factor of 0.0011081.
SBM20 = 16.27 cpm = 0.1028 usv/h (conv. 0.006315)
SI8B = 92.77 cpm = conversion factor 0.0011081 (I assume the same value measured with SBM20 0.1028 usv/h)
I run a parallel measurement with a bgeigie nano kit and I found a difference on the mean values on one hour of 0.00546 usv/h.
SI8B = 92.75cpm (conv 0.0011081)= 0.1027825 usv/h
Bgeigie= 32.5cpm (conv 0.002994) = 0.097324 usv/h
So I think that a conversion factor of 0.0011081 can be a good value, what do you think?
OrtoSystem
Thank you for this excellent contribution.
SI8B was added with a linear factor of 0.001108
It will be added to the KIT1 repo soon too!
Direct unit link: https://www.uradmonitor.com/?open=13000208&sensor=cpm
Merry Christmas!