- This topic has 6 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
Scott McInness.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 29, 2020 at 11:54 am #28474
Wolferl
ModeratorJust guessing….maybe there is firewall enabled in that switch?
Also try to enable all 10/100/1000M modes.July 29, 2020 at 3:32 pm #28475Marius Paulauskas
ParticipantIt has nothing to do with firewalls if link is not being negotiated.
and what do you mean by “enable all 10/100/1000M modes”? It auto-negotiates speed/duplex but I also tried forcing manually – nothing worked.August 1, 2020 at 10:41 pm #28478Ken Jamrogowicz
ParticipantI would like to explain my suggestion to add a length of cable between the A3 and the “enterprise class” switch. I have observed that some of the commercial switches that are designed to comfortably drive 1000M through 100m of cable are producing a rather powerful transmit signal. If you connect that to an Ethernet interface that is designed for “hobby” type application, the little transformers in the adapter can get saturated and make garbage out of the signal that the micro sees. The conclusion would be that this is not a valid network. It might barely work, if you force the connection to 10M because then you have some nanoseconds for the transformers to come out of saturation. But not for all data strings. Inserting a length of lossy cable between the switch and the A3 would ameliorate this particular problem (if it is the problem).
Ken
August 24, 2020 at 7:53 pm #28500Radu
Keymaster@ke2n this is a very interesting suggestion. Another solution was to provision the A3’s with Static IP settings to match the network it is being used in.
This works perfectly, so perhaps the problem is a different one, rather related to some DHCP issues?
August 24, 2020 at 9:04 pm #28509Ken Jamrogowicz
ParticipantQuite some time ago I changed my router to supply a static connection for the uRad monitor, but it obviously has not helped my particular unit.
= =
The problem at the top of this chain of notes was one of the unit having trouble recognizing that it had a valid PHY connection. So – quite a bit before the issue of DHCP comes up. I actually ran into this sort of problem with an earthquake sensor that I run here. Until I added the extra length of cable, there was all kind of noise on the earthquake signal. This only happened when it was connected to a gigabit switch rated for 100 meters of cable …April 21, 2021 at 7:09 am #28832Scott McInness
Participant@mpaulauskas were you able to resolve this issue? I’m having the same experience with a
Model A 3.4
, which has worked fine connected to an 8-port switch module in a Cisco 1941W for five years but doesn’t work on a 2960S. I have anA3
(wired) at work, which works on a 2960-X (with about 25m of structured cable) and also a 6509 (1m patch lead).The interface comes up for ~15 seconds and then goes down and, as you observed, no MAC address appears in the CAM table. The Ethernet controller in the
A
seems to lock up at that point, since leaving it powered and connecting it back to the 1941 results in the interface still not coming up. Power-cycling theA
returns it to normal operation.Interestingly, if the
A
is booted whilst connected to the 1941 and I re-patch it to the 2960S it works fine. Booting it whilst not connected to anything results in a locked-up Ethernet controller after ~15 seconds, which requires power-cycling to rectify.The
A
is the only thing left connected to the 1941, which is being retired since I have a new firewall, it’s old, doesn’t have enough ports, and also no longer need the ADSL capability. I have a wirelessA3
at home, as well, so I may just end up retiring theModel A
. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.